Summary
The tide of data never stops rising, and the types and sources of data never stop multiplying. Never have there been so many communication devices, apps, and services available. Never have there been so many ways to collaborate with others and generate electronically-stored information (ESI). Unfortunately, that also means there has never been more data that legal practitioners must somehow find a way to analyze and review. Finding a way that is efficient and effective requires understanding the range of tools and techniques available to you so you can pick the right tool for the right job.
In this Practice Guide
- Use cases and goals for analytic tool use
- The range of analytic tools available
- How to match tools to your goals
Key Insights
- Which tools are best for revealing unknown unknowns
- Which tools are best for collection gap analysis
- Which tools are best for fast ECA and review
Practice Guide Download
About the Authors
From the author
Alphabet Soup: TAR CAL, and Assisted Review
Over the decade since TAR first rose to prominence, solutions, acronyms, and new cases have proliferated dramatically. All of this rapid technical and legal evolution has made it challenging for practitioners to get a simple handle on TAR and CAL approaches and what they mean for their matters.
Keep Calm and CAL On: Key Decisions about Continuous Active Learning
On any new matter, an eDiscovery professional must assess the project’s goals and whether CAL can be leveraged to help achieve those goals. When considering CAL, there are three main decision points: deciding whether to use CAL, deciding how to use CAL, and deciding when your CAL process is complete.