Summary
The majority of eDiscovery work takes place in the context of litigation, but a significant amount of it takes place instead in the context of investigations. Although the available ESI and eDiscovery technologies are the same, the realities of handling investigations can be different in some ways important ways. This paper reviews what practitioners need to know about eDiscovery in the context of investigations, including the need for speed and secrecy, the need for nuanced analysis and review, and the need to be prepared for later litigation.
In this Whitepaper
- Options for achieving needed speed
- Tools and techniques for nuanced review
- How to prepare for potential litigation
Key Insights
- The importance of controlling information flow
- The complexity of multi-channel communication
- The likelihood of obfuscation and spoliation
Whitepaper Download
About the Author
From the author
Alphabet Soup: TAR CAL, and Assisted Review
Over the decade since TAR first rose to prominence, solutions, acronyms, and new cases have proliferated dramatically. All of this rapid technical and legal evolution has made it challenging for practitioners to get a simple handle on TAR and CAL approaches and what they mean for their matters.
ED102 – In the Beginning: Identification and Preservation Fundamentals
Identification and preservation are the first and most fundamental phases of an electronic discovery effort. The duty of (identification and) preservation is a foundational concept in our legal system that grows out of the common law concept of “spoliation,” which is nearly 300 years old.