{"id":77373,"date":"2022-04-18T10:58:59","date_gmt":"2022-04-18T15:58:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.consilio.com\/?post_type=avada_portfolio&p=77373"},"modified":"2022-09-29T15:58:42","modified_gmt":"2022-09-29T20:58:42","slug":"alphabet-soup-tar-cal-and-assisted-review","status":"publish","type":"avada_portfolio","link":"https:\/\/www.consilio.com\/resource\/alphabet-soup-tar-cal-and-assisted-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Alphabet Soup: TAR CAL, and Assisted Review"},"content":{"rendered":"

Summary<\/h2><\/div>

Over the decade since TAR first rose to prominence, solutions, acronyms, and new cases have proliferated dramatically. All of this rapid technical and legal evolution has made it challenging for practitioners to get a simple handle on TAR and CAL approaches and what they mean for their matters.<\/p>\n

This white paper explores these complexities to better equip you to leverage TAR and CAL in your matters. We will discuss a variety of topics, including key terms and concepts; different approaches and their applications; quality of results; permission for use; compulsion to use; process transparency and objections; and, using search terms before TAR.<\/p>\n<\/div>

In this Whitepaper<\/h2><\/div>
    \n
  • Key terms and concepts<\/li>\n
  • Approaches and their applications<\/li>\n
  • A decade of relevant case law<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>

    Key Insights<\/h2><\/div>
      \n
    • The importance of Sedona Principle 6<\/li>\n
    • How good is good enough<\/li>\n
    • Courts’ preference for transparency<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>
      <\/div><\/div><\/div>